it has been non-functional for years and caused numerous memleaks and
crashes for people that tried to enable it.
it has no maintained upstream source, and it does not look like it's
going to be fixed any time soon
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 45423
To prevent future confusion around '/overlay' vs. 'overlay' simply reject
relative path specifications as mount points since such paths result in
undefined behaviour anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jow@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 45404
It seems to have few ports connected to CPU (only for CPU sending data?)
as part of "SMP dual core 3 GMAC setup" feature.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 45403
On BCM5301X there are two different cases to handle: CPU port 8 vs. any
other one. Support for CPU port 8 was already partially implemented but
it lacked setting some extra bit for 2G speed. It also will need to be
extended to implement "SMP dual core 3 GMAC setup". That's the reason
for handling it in separated code block.
This patch also adds overriding CPU port state for port other than 8. It
requires using recently defined GMII_PORT registers.
It was tested for regressions on BCM53011 revs 2 & 3. It was also
confirmed to fix switch on some internal Broadcom board.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 45402
In most cases it allows reverting back to the vendor firmware (as they
usually don't use UBI). If users wants to do that we can't do anything
anyway. Erease counters will be just lost. The only thing we do is warn:
"Flashing firmware without UBI for rootfs. All erase counters will be
lost."
It still requires forcing sysupgrade.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 45392
We can now detect that provided firmware contains kernel and UBI image
partitions. Flashing it in a sane way (keeping erase counters) still
needs to be implemented.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 45391
With previous version of patch info about need of erasing blocks was
stored once per boot. It was breaking in following scenario:
1) First boot after installation (erasing blocks after 0xdeadc0de)
2) Doing sysupgrade (with ubidetach & ubiformat)
3) Attaching UBI again (it caused all blocks to be erased)
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 45387
It currently does not seem to make a difference anymore, except by
increasing compressed kernel image size
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 45385
Two errors "netifd: radio0: sh: bad number" have recently surfaced in system
log in trunk when wifi interfaces come up. I tracked the errors to checking
numerical values of some config options without ensuring that the option has
any value.
The errors I see have apparently been introduced by r45051 (ieee80211r in
hostapd) and r45326 (start_disabled in mac80211). My patches fix two
instances of "bad number", but there may be a third one, as the original
report in bug 19345 pre-dates r45326 and already has two "bad number" errors
for radio0.
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/19345
Signed-off-by: Hannu Nyman <hannu.nyman@iki.fi>
SVN-Revision: 45380
Two errors "netifd: radio0: sh: bad number" have recently surfaced in system
log in trunk when wifi interfaces come up. I tracked the errors to checking
numerical values of some config options without ensuring that the option has
any value.
The errors I see have apparently been introduced by r45051 (ieee80211r in
hostapd) and r45326 (start_disabled in mac80211). My patches fix two
instances of "bad number", but there may be a third one, as the original
report in bug 19345 pre-dates r45326 and already has two "bad number" errors
for radio0.
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/19345
Signed-off-by: Hannu Nyman <hannu.nyman@iki.fi>
SVN-Revision: 45379
Steven Barth
Felix Fietkau
Imre Kaloz
Luka Perkov
Jo-Philipp Wich
Rafał Miłecki
John Crispin