This updates the uboot for the sunxi target to version 2018.11
The removed patches are applied upstream and not needed any more.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
The NanoPi NEO2 is a small Allwinner H5 based board available with
different DRAM configurations.
This board is very similar to the NanoPi NEO PLUS2
Signed-off-by: Jasper Scholte <NightNL@outlook.com>
CPU: H5 High Performance Quad-core 64-bit Cortex-A53
GPU: Mali450 OpenGL ES 2.0/1.1/1.0, OpenVG 1.1, EGL
Memory: 1GB DDR3 (shared with GPU)
Onboard Storage: TF card (Max. 32GB) / NOR flash(2MB)
Onboard Network: 1000M/100M Ethernet RJ45
USB 2.0 Ports: Three USB 2.0 HOST, one USB 2.0 OTG, HOST mode
role by default in DTS
Buttons: Power Button(SW4) Debug TTL
UART: ..DC-IN..
>[GND][RX][TX] ..HDMI..
Signed-off-by: Antonio Silverio <menion@gmail.com>
This patch 220-add-sunxi50i-nanopi-neo-plus2.patch was merged upstream.
The u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin is now also created for the ARM64 sunxi
boards by U-Boot itself, no need to do it manually any more.
This was tested on a H2+ Orange Pi R1 and a H5 Orange Pi Zero Plus.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
The uboot target is named MarsBoard_A10 and it was not build at all.
This fixes a build problem seen by the build bot.
Fixes: 6a3565985f ("sunxi: Added profile for HAOYU Electronics Marsboard A10")
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
- H3 @ 1.3 GHz
- 1GiB DDR3
- 10/100Mbps Ethernet
- Realtek RTL8189ETV wifi
- 4 USB 2.0
Difference to the "Orange Pi Plus" is the lack of Gbit ethernet
and lack of onboard flash.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan HERPAI <wigyori@uid0.hu>
The MarsBoard was a short-lived credit-card sized, extendable board with an Allwinner A10 SoC.
http://linux-sunxi.org/MarsBoard_A10
Signed-off-by: Kayo Phoenix <kayo@illumium.org>
[Forward-ported to new target layout:]
Signed-off-by: Zoltan HERPAI <wigyori@uid0.hu>
The following features are working and tested:
* both Ethernet ports
* MMC
* LED
The following features are not working:
* Wifi (There is a crappy driver we could port)
* SPI flash (I haven't looked into this)
I haven't tried out the rest.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Signed-off-by: Lucian Cristian <lucian.cristian@gmail.com>
[replaced u-boot patch with original version from u-boot git]
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Do not put the u-boot images into the kernel build directory as this directory
might get removed after kernel updates while the u-boot packages InstallDev
recipe is not getting re-executed because it is still considered current,
leading to image build failures later on due to missing images.
To ensure that built bootloader images persist over kernel version updates in
the buildroot, put them into the new STAGING_DIR_IMAGE directory.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
Instead of referencing u-boot packages from device profiles and having a
-all metapackage, make the u-boot packages hidden (they don't install to
bin/ anyway), and name the files in KERNEL_BUILD_DIR appropriately
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
While at it, the following changes are introduced
- Rewrite the Makefile for better readability
- Make parallel builds possible
Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou <yszhou4tech@gmail.com>
Install uboot files to KERNEL_BUILD_DIR instead of BIN_DIR to fix
ImageBuilder. Similar fixes are necessary for many (all?) other uboot
targets.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
SVN-Revision: 46605
This will ease adding new targets and updating:
* split UBOOTS var into multiple lines
* remove version from TITLE
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Thill <nico@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 43187
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155