openwrt-owl/target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.24/1090-fix-s3c2410_timer_setu...

129 lines
4.2 KiB
Diff

From 6ce7c9b239314f4ee9f86164da8aaf5f78c0d1f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: warmcat <andy@warmcat.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:25:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fix-s3c2410_timer_setup-resume-BUG.patch
---
arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/time.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/i2c/chips/pcf50633.c | 9 +++++++--
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/time.c b/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/time.c
index c11d0dd..6989eea 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/time.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/time.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
static unsigned long timer_startval;
static unsigned long timer_usec_ticks;
+static struct work_struct resume_work;
#define TIMER_USEC_SHIFT 16
@@ -201,9 +202,12 @@ static void s3c2410_timer_setup (void)
pclk = clk_get_rate(clk);
+ printk("pclk = %d\n", pclk);
+
/* configure clock tick */
timer_usec_ticks = timer_mask_usec_ticks(6, pclk);
+ printk("timer_usec_ticks = %d\n", timer_usec_ticks);
tcfg1 &= ~S3C2410_TCFG1_MUX4_MASK;
tcfg1 |= S3C2410_TCFG1_MUX4_DIV2;
@@ -212,6 +216,11 @@ static void s3c2410_timer_setup (void)
tcfg0 |= ((6 - 1) / 2) << S3C2410_TCFG_PRESCALER1_SHIFT;
tcnt = (pclk / 6) / HZ;
+
+ /* start the timer running */
+ tcon |= S3C2410_TCON_T4START | S3C2410_TCON_T4RELOAD;
+ tcon &= ~S3C2410_TCON_T4MANUALUPD;
+ __raw_writel(tcon, S3C2410_TCON);
}
/* timers reload after counting zero, so reduce the count by 1 */
@@ -247,10 +256,34 @@ static void s3c2410_timer_setup (void)
tcon |= S3C2410_TCON_T4START;
tcon &= ~S3C2410_TCON_T4MANUALUPD;
__raw_writel(tcon, S3C2410_TCON);
+
+ __raw_writel(__raw_readl(S3C2410_INTMSK) & (~(1UL << 14)),
+ S3C2410_INTMSK);
+
+}
+
+static void timer_resume_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ s3c2410_timer_setup();
+}
+
+/* ooh a nasty situation arises if we try to call s3c2410_timer_setup() from
+ * the resume handler. It is called in atomic context but the clock APIs
+ * try to lock a mutex which may sleep. We are in a bit of an unusual
+ * situation because we don't have a tick source right now, but it should be
+ * okay to try to schedule a work item... hopefully
+ */
+
+static void s3c2410_timer_resume_atomic(void)
+{
+ int ret = schedule_work(&resume_work);
+ if (!ret)
+ printk(KERN_INFO"Failed to schedule_work tick ctr (%d)\n", ret);
}
static void __init s3c2410_timer_init (void)
{
+ INIT_WORK(&resume_work, timer_resume_work);
s3c2410_timer_setup();
setup_irq(IRQ_TIMER4, &s3c2410_timer_irq);
}
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/chips/pcf50633.c b/drivers/i2c/chips/pcf50633.c
index e23c540..91b9ac3 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/chips/pcf50633.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/pcf50633.c
@@ -1926,9 +1926,11 @@ static int pcf50633_resume(struct device *dev)
struct pcf50633_data *pcf = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
int i;
- mutex_lock(&pcf->lock);
+ printk(KERN_INFO"a\n");
+ /* mutex_lock(&pcf->lock); */ /* resume in atomic context */
__reg_write(pcf, PCF50633_REG_LEDENA, 0x01);
+ printk(KERN_INFO"b\n");
/* Resume all saved registers that don't "survive" standby state */
__reg_write(pcf, PCF50633_REG_INT1M, pcf->standby_regs.int1m);
@@ -1936,6 +1938,7 @@ static int pcf50633_resume(struct device *dev)
__reg_write(pcf, PCF50633_REG_INT3M, pcf->standby_regs.int3m);
__reg_write(pcf, PCF50633_REG_INT4M, pcf->standby_regs.int4m);
__reg_write(pcf, PCF50633_REG_INT5M, pcf->standby_regs.int5m);
+ printk(KERN_INFO"c\n");
__reg_write(pcf, PCF50633_REG_OOCTIM2, pcf->standby_regs.ooctim2);
__reg_write(pcf, PCF50633_REG_AUTOOUT, pcf->standby_regs.autoout);
@@ -1949,14 +1952,16 @@ static int pcf50633_resume(struct device *dev)
__reg_write(pcf, PCF50633_REG_LEDOUT, pcf->standby_regs.ledout);
__reg_write(pcf, PCF50633_REG_LEDENA, pcf->standby_regs.ledena);
__reg_write(pcf, PCF50633_REG_LEDDIM, pcf->standby_regs.leddim);
+ printk(KERN_INFO"d\n");
/* FIXME: one big read? */
for (i = 0; i < 7; i++) {
u_int8_t reg_out = PCF50633_REG_LDO1OUT + 2*i;
__reg_write(pcf, reg_out, pcf->standby_regs.ldo[i].out);
__reg_write(pcf, reg_out+1, pcf->standby_regs.ldo[i].ena);
}
+ printk(KERN_INFO"e\n");
- mutex_unlock(&pcf->lock);
+ /* mutex_unlock(&pcf->lock); */ /* resume in atomic context */
pcf50633_irq(pcf->irq, pcf);
--
1.5.6.5