openwrt-owl/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-3.18/800-bcma-use-two-different-...

66 lines
1.9 KiB
Diff

From 666bdfc027cde41a171862dc698987a378c8b66a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:00:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH RFC] bcma: use two different initcalls if built-in
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
This is needed as we can't initialize bus during fs_initcall.
Initialization requires SPROM which depends on NVRAM which depends on
mtd. Since mtd, spi, nand, spi-nor use standard module_init, we have to
do the same in bcma.
Without this we'll try to initialize SPROM without having a ready SPROM
proviver registered using bcma_arch_register_fallback_sprom.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
---
While this patch seems to work and I can compile bcma as built-in and
module, I'm not too proud of it. I don't really like these #if(n)def
tricks and I'm afraid bcma_modinit may be called even if
bcma_modinit_early failed.
Do you see any better idea of solving this?
---
drivers/bcma/main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/bcma/main.c
+++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c
@@ -637,13 +637,25 @@ static int bcma_device_uevent(struct dev
core->id.rev, core->id.class);
}
+/* Bus has to be registered early, before any bcma driver */
+static int __init bcma_modinit_early(void)
+{
+ return bus_register(&bcma_bus_type);
+}
+#ifndef MODULE
+fs_initcall(bcma_modinit_early);
+#endif
+
+/* Initialization has to be done later with SPI/mtd/NAND/SPROM available */
static int __init bcma_modinit(void)
{
int err;
- err = bus_register(&bcma_bus_type);
+#ifdef MODULE
+ err = bcma_modinit_early();
if (err)
return err;
+#endif
err = bcma_host_soc_register_driver();
if (err) {
@@ -660,7 +672,7 @@ static int __init bcma_modinit(void)
return err;
}
-fs_initcall(bcma_modinit);
+module_init(bcma_modinit);
static void __exit bcma_modexit(void)
{