The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
* fixes wrong indentation
* keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
* fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
* combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46664
The following patch fixes:
* wrong indentations
* doubled gpio-keys-polled nodes (DIR-300-B7, DIR-320-B1, DIR-610-A1)
* duplicate spacings
* empty lines at end of files and after last child nodes
* trailing and leading whitespace
* unnecessary and commented-out code
* missing empty lines between nodes and between properties and nodes
* unnecessary empty lines between nodes properties [1]
in .dts{,i} files, for ramips target.
[1] Some of empty lines in SOCs dtsi files were left untouched, because they seem to be there for a reason (readability?).
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46613
I got work with this patch.
Ethernet switch (includes VLAN), WiFi connected via PCIe, LEDs, buttons.
In mtd partion map of DTS file, I renamed Linux firmware regions (kernel + root squashfs) to “firmware”because it allows kernel to split kernel and roots and rootfsdata.
signed-off-by: ngc@ff.iij4u.or.jp
——
——
SVN-Revision: 44470
John Crispin